M\u00e9dia se sna\u017e\u00ed obvinit Benedikta XVI., \u017ee byl informov\u00e1n o p\u0159\u00edpadech zneu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed d\u011bt\u00ed kn\u011b\u017e\u00edmi a \u017ee nic neud\u011blal. \u010casto argumentuj\u00ed nepravdiv\u00fdmi nebo p\u0159ekroucen\u00fdmi argumenty. Ani v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b onoho kn\u011bze v mnichovsk\u00e9 diec\u00e9zi, kde byl Ratzinger arcibiskupem, to ov\u0161em nevy\u0161lo… A nyn\u00ed se \u0161ermuje s p\u0159\u00edpadem americk\u00e9ho kn\u011bze Murphyho, kter\u00fd v diec\u00e9zi Milwaukee, v\u00a0\u00fastavu pro sluchov\u011b posti\u017een\u00e9 d\u011bti ve Wisconsinu, m\u011bl \u00fadajn\u011b sexu\u00e1ln\u011b zneu\u017e\u00edt asi 200 d\u011bt\u00ed. M\u00e9dia se sna\u017e\u00ed tento p\u0159\u00edpad p\u0159ipsat pape\u017ei Benediktu XVI. a cht\u011bj\u00ed tvrdit, \u017ee o tom v\u011bd\u011bl a \u017ee tyto p\u0159\u00edpady \u201ezametl pod koberec\u201c.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0Lidov\u00e9 noviny uve\u0159ejnily dne 26. b\u0159ezna bulv\u00e1rn\u00ed, neprofesion\u00e1ln\u00ed \u010dl\u00e1nek s nepravdiv\u00fdm titulem \u201ePape\u017e tajil zneu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed 200 d\u011bt\u00ed\u201c a s podtitulem \u201eExistuj\u00ed d\u016fkazy o tom, \u017ee Josef Ratzinger v\u011bd\u011bl o sexu\u00e1ln\u00edm obt\u011b\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed nesly\u0161\u00edc\u00edch d\u011bt\u00ed kn\u011bzem\u201c. \u010cl\u00e1nek z pera Vladim\u00edry Strakov\u00e9. Tento \u010dl\u00e1nek je klasick\u00fdm p\u0159\u00edpadem, jak n\u011bkdy v takov\u00fdchto z\u00e1le\u017eitostech noviny l\u017eou a ohlupuj\u00ed sv\u00e9 \u010dten\u00e1\u0159e vymy\u0161len\u00fdmi a p\u0159ekroucen\u00fdmi zpr\u00e1vami. O kauze sexu\u00e1ln\u00edho zneu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed d\u011bt\u00ed kn\u011b\u017e\u00edmi jsem napsal na sv\u00fdch webov\u00fdch str\u00e1nk\u00e1ch jasn\u00fd \u010dl\u00e1nek a nem\u00edn\u00edm ani tady zakr\u00fdvat pravdu. Ale proti ka\u017ed\u00e9 l\u017ei je t\u0159eba se postavit. D\u011blal jsem to za komunismu a byl za to pron\u00e1sledov\u00e1n. Nemohu jednat jinak ani dnes, kdy u\u017e je mo\u017en\u00e9 na le\u017e uk\u00e1zat a napsat pravdu.<\/p>\n
Sledujme chv\u00edli rozklad onoho bulv\u00e1rn\u00edho \u010dl\u00e1nku, kter\u00fd je uk\u00e1zkou hrub\u00e9 protic\u00edrkevn\u00ed kampan\u011b ve stylu n\u011bkdej\u0161\u00edch komunistick\u00fdch m\u00e9di\u00ed. V bombastick\u00e9m vymy\u0161len\u00e9m a nepravdiv\u00e9m titulku \u201ePape\u017e tajil zneu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed 200 d\u011bt\u00ed\u201c cht\u011bj\u00ed LN sv\u00fdm \u010dten\u00e1\u0159\u016fm namluvit, co titulek hl\u00e1s\u00e1. Mluv\u00ed o dob\u011b, kdy Ratzinger nebyl pape\u017eem. \u010cili \u201epape\u017e\u201c nic netajil. Ale to v\u0161e se hod\u00ed. D\u016fkazy o tom bohu\u017eel ani LN, ani jin\u00e1 m\u00e9dia nep\u0159edkl\u00e1daj\u00ed. N\u00ed\u017ee tedy uv\u00e1d\u00edm pravdu, zvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b na podkladu dopisu mluv\u010d\u00edho Vatik\u00e1nu P. Lombardiho listu The New York Times, kter\u00fd p\u016fvodn\u011b \u010dl\u00e1nek s t\u00edmto obsahem uve\u0159ejnil, aby si \u010dten\u00e1\u0159i mohli ud\u011blat p\u0159edstavu o v\u011brohodnosti LN. Jist\u011b i \u010cTK si v\u0161imne tohoto uveden\u00ed na pravou m\u00edru, aby tak\u00e9 neroz\u0161i\u0159ovala nepravdy a neztr\u00e1cela v\u011brohodnost.<\/p>\n
LN se nikterak neobt\u011b\u017euj\u00ed dolo\u017eit sv\u00e9 vymy\u0161len\u00e9 tvrzen\u00ed, \u017ee \u201eexistuj\u00ed d\u016fkazy\u201c. Autorka \u010dl\u00e1nku bu\u010f nedostate\u010dn\u011b ch\u00e1pe celou slo\u017eitou kauzu, nebo si neprofesion\u00e1ln\u011b vym\u00fd\u0161l\u00ed, \u201e\u017ee pape\u017e v\u011bd\u011bl o p\u0159\u00edpadu americk\u00e9ho duchovn\u00edho, kter\u00fd zneu\u017eil a\u017e 200 chlapc\u016f ve \u0161kole pro nesly\u0161\u00edc\u00ed, ale v\u011bdom\u011b to ignoroval\u201c. Zam\u011b\u0148uje pape\u017ee a prefekta kongregace, aby to bylo p\u016fsobiv\u011bj\u0161\u00ed. R\u016fzn\u00e9 formulace \u010dl\u00e1nku jsou tak\u00e9 \u00fa\u010delov\u011b stylizov\u00e1ny, jako \u017ee od 50. let doty\u010dn\u00fd kn\u011bz pracoval v onom \u00fastavu, a \u201eb\u011bhem t\u00e9 doby se opakovan\u011b dopou\u0161t\u011bl…\u201c. Mluv\u00ed se tu o \u201e\u010detn\u00fdch sv\u011bdectv\u00edch\u201c, ale pro\u010d civiln\u00ed policejn\u00ed org\u00e1ny, kter\u00e9 celou v\u011bc v 70. letech \u0161et\u0159ily, proces zastavily, to LN nezji\u0161\u0165uj\u00ed, pon\u011bvad\u017e se jim to nehod\u00ed. Z\u0159ejm\u011b z\u00e1m\u011brn\u011b se tu neuv\u00e1d\u00ed, kdy se kardin\u00e1l Ratzinger o v\u011bci dov\u011bd\u011bl, ale formulace bud\u00ed dojem, \u017ee hned tehdy v 70. letech. Co\u017e je (z\u00e1m\u011brn\u00e1?) nepravda LN.<\/p>\n
A d\u00e1le autorka ve sv\u00e9 \u201ev\u0161ev\u011bdoucnosti\u201c (nebo sp\u00ed\u0161e nen\u00e1visti v\u016f\u010di c\u00edrkvi) p\u00ed\u0161e, \u017ee \u201ev\u011bdom\u011b to ignoroval\u201c, ani\u017e by uvedla nejmen\u0161\u00ed d\u016fkaz. V t\u00e9 dob\u011b nebyl Ratzinger je\u0161t\u011b v\u016fbec prefektem kongregace. Zam\u011b\u0148uje kauzu v 50.-70. letech, kter\u00e1 nebyla nahl\u00e1\u0161ena Vatik\u00e1nu, a \u201eRatzinger\u201c tedy o n\u00ed v\u011bd\u011bt nemohl, pon\u011bvad\u017e tam je\u0161t\u011b nebyl, a plete ji se z\u00e1le\u017eitost\u00ed \u0159e\u0161enou za dvacet let, v roce 1996, u Kongregace pro nauku v\u00edry. Jak voln\u011b autorka zach\u00e1z\u00ed z fakty, je mo\u017en\u00e9 si v\u0161imnout i na jedn\u00e9 mali\u010dkosti. Uv\u00e1d\u00ed, \u017ee \u201ese st\u00ed\u017enosti na duchovn\u00edho dostaly a\u017e na st\u016fl arcibiskupa Weaklanda\u201c v roce 1993, zat\u00edmco se to stalo v roce 1996, jak p\u0159esn\u011b l\u00ed\u010d\u00ed \u010dasov\u00fd postup cel\u00e9 kauzy i s podrobn\u00fdmi daty na z\u00e1klad\u011b materi\u00e1l\u016f od soudu z diec\u00e9ze mluv\u010d\u00ed Vatik\u00e1nu P. Lombardi ve v\u00fd\u0161e zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9m dopise pro The New York Times.<\/p>\n
Kauza prob\u00edhala takto: st\u00ed\u017enosti byly v 70. letech p\u016fvodn\u011b pod\u00e1ny nejprve m\u00edstn\u00ed policii. Ta zah\u00e1jila vy\u0161et\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed a p\u0159\u00edpad p\u0159edala dal\u0161\u00edm org\u00e1n\u016fm. Ale ani tady nepadla \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 \u017ealoba. Z uveden\u00e9ho procesu se o v\u011bci dov\u011bd\u011bla tak\u00e9 diec\u00e9ze. Je\u0161t\u011b v pr\u016fb\u011bhu vy\u0161et\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed byl kn\u011bz v roce 1974 z m\u00edsta odstran\u011bn. V roce 1975 byl veden proces proti diec\u00e9zi Milwaukee, v n\u00ed\u017e se \u010diny staly, ale proces byl v roce 1976 polici\u00ed uzav\u0159en. Pro\u010d? Nikdo nezji\u0161\u0165uje a ne\u0159\u00edk\u00e1… Tedy ze strany c\u00edrkve nebylo nic zaml\u010deno ani zme\u0161k\u00e1no. C\u00edrkev doty\u010dn\u00e9ho kn\u011bze odstranila a sv\u011btsk\u00e9 org\u00e1ny, kter\u00e9 m\u011bly v t\u00e9 v\u011bci kompetenci, od dal\u0161\u00edho vy\u0161et\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed upustily a v\u011bc uzav\u0159ely. Vatik\u00e1nu nebylo nic ohl\u00e1\u0161eno. A tak p\u0159\u00edpad utichl. O tomto po\u010d\u00e1te\u010dn\u00edm v\u00fdvoji ale LN nep\u00ed\u0161\u00ed, pon\u011bvad\u017e se to ned\u00e1 pou\u017e\u00edt proti c\u00edrkvi a pape\u017ei. Sm\u011b\u0161uj\u00ed to s pozd\u011bj\u0161\u00ed kauzou a soust\u0159ed\u00ed se a\u017e na chv\u00edli, kdy byla kauza po 20 letech (!) hl\u00e1\u0161ena Vatik\u00e1nu. Tak\u00e9 tady celou z\u00e1le\u017eitost zkresluj\u00ed, aby to vy\u0161lo proti kardin\u00e1lovi Ratzingerovi …<\/p>\n
S uzav\u0159en\u00edm cel\u00e9 kauzy u ve\u0159ejn\u00fdch \u00fa\u0159ad\u016f v roce 1976 ob\u011bti nebyly samoz\u0159ejm\u011b spokojen\u00e9, a tak pracovaly d\u00e1le. V roce 1995 za\u010dala diec\u00e9ze dost\u00e1vat dopisy, kter\u00e9 se p\u0159\u00edpadu doty\u010dn\u00e9ho kn\u011bze t\u00fdkaly. Tehdy, tedy 20 let po inkriminovan\u00e9 dob\u011b, arcibiskup Weakland poslal kardin\u00e1lu Ratzingerovi, prefektu Kongregace pro nauku v\u00edry, dopis s datem 17. \u010dervence 1996. A 15. \u0159\u00edjna arcibiskup na\u0159izuje c\u00edrkevn\u00ed soudn\u00ed proces proti kn\u011bzi Murphymu. Zda tak rozhodl s\u00e1m nebo m\u011bl pokyn z Vatik\u00e1nu, se nikde ne\u0159\u00edk\u00e1. Kodex kanonick\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va nep\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1 v podobn\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech automatick\u00e9 uvalen\u00ed trestu p\u0159\u00edmo sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n\u00edm \u010dinu, ale doporu\u010duje, aby proces nevylu\u010doval i nejt\u011b\u017e\u0161\u00ed trest propu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed z duchovn\u00edho stavu. Proces se slo\u017eit\u011b vyv\u00edjel, pon\u011bvad\u017e bylo zapot\u0159eb\u00ed ud\u011blat \u0159adu \u0161et\u0159en\u00ed. Z materi\u00e1lu toho soudn\u00edho procesu vypl\u00fdv\u00e1, \u017ee dne 6. ledna 1998 napsal obvin\u011bn\u00fd kn\u011bz Murphy kongregaci dopis, ve kter\u00e9m \u017e\u00e1d\u00e1, aby pro zna\u010dnou \u010dasovou vzd\u00e1lenost od on\u011bch \u010din\u016f, bylo upu\u0161t\u011bno od nejtvrd\u0161\u00edho trestu, toti\u017e od vylou\u010den\u00ed z duchovn\u00edho stavu.<\/p>\n
U\u017e dne 6. dubna pisatel dostal od kongregace zam\u00edtavou odpov\u011b\u010f sv\u00e9 \u017e\u00e1dosti s od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00edm, \u017ee na tyto \u010diny se \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 lh\u016fty nevztahuj\u00ed. \u010cili kongregace, kardin\u00e1l Ratzinger ani arcibiskup Bertone nic netajili ani nezastavovali. Naopak! Diec\u00e9zn\u00ed soud zapo\u010dat\u00fd v roce 1996 d\u00e1le prob\u00edhal norm\u00e1ln\u011b a p\u0159edpokl\u00e1dal skon\u010den\u00ed procesu v srpnu 1998. Jsou tu dv\u011b v\u011bci, kter\u00e9 LN tak\u00e9 p\u0159ekrucuj\u00ed, nerozli\u0161uj\u00ed a sm\u011b\u0161uj\u00ed: ohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f diec\u00e9z\u00ed, reakce na to byla b\u011b\u017en\u00e1\u00a0\u2013\u00a0soudn\u00ed proces, co\u017e se stalo. A pak: soukrom\u00fd dopis, \u017e\u00e1dost kn\u011bze Murphyho adresovan\u00e1 obecn\u011b kongregaci.<\/p>\n
LN z neznalosti c\u00edrkevn\u00ed situace, \u00fa\u0159ad\u016f a praxe, p\u00ed\u0161\u00ed, \u017ee Murphyho \u201edopis z\u016fstal bez odezvy\u201c, co\u017e je le\u017e. V materi\u00e1lu diec\u00e9zn\u00edho soudu Milwaukee se \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee Murphy napsal \u201ekongregaci dopis\u201c. Jeho kauza byla kanonickopr\u00e1vn\u00ed. Proto\u017ee tehdy arcibiskup Bertone, sekret\u00e1\u0159 kongregace, byl pr\u00e1vn\u00edkem, dostal podle kompetence dopis k vy\u0159\u00edzen\u00ed on. Dopis se t\u00fdkal osobn\u00ed v\u011bci Murphyho v cel\u00e9 t\u00e9 kauze. I na tuto soukromou \u017e\u00e1dost napsal arcibiskup Bertone odpov\u011b\u010f do t\u0159\u00ed m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f, co\u017e nen\u00ed na vatik\u00e1nsk\u00e9 pom\u011bry \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 dlouh\u00e1 doba. Ale o tom v\u0161em LN ml\u010d\u00ed, proto\u017ee se jim to nehodilo do jejich \u00fatoku na pape\u017ee. Nepravdiv\u00e9 je tak\u00e9 dal\u0161\u00ed jejich tvrzen\u00ed, ve kter\u00e9m autorka sm\u011b\u0161uje dv\u011b v\u011bci a je\u0161t\u011b si z neznalosti vym\u00fd\u0161l\u00ed: \u201eteprve po 8 m\u011bs\u00edc\u00edch (nev\u00edm, kde to vzala!)<\/em> dostal arcibiskup Weakland instrukci od jin\u00e9ho \u010dlena kongregace T. Bertoneho\u2026\u201c Naopak, u\u017e p\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u00ed m\u011bs\u00edc po odm\u00edtav\u00e9 odpov\u011bdi Murphymu na jeho soukrom\u00fd dopis, kter\u00fd LN zaml\u010dely, svol\u00e1v\u00e1 arcibiskup Bertone, kter\u00fd m\u011bl kauzu na starosti, poradu biskup\u016f, jich\u017e se v\u011bc t\u00fdkala: arcibiskup Weaklanda a dal\u0161\u00edch biskup\u016f, a po vz\u00e1jemn\u00e9 konzultaci doch\u00e1zej\u00ed k z\u00e1v\u011bru, \u017ee vzhledem k\u00a0\u010dasu, kter\u00fd ub\u011bhl, vzhledem k tomu, \u017ee za posledn\u00edch 20 let nebyly hl\u00e1\u0161eny \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 dal\u0161\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpady Murphyho zneu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed, nen\u00ed z\u0159ejm\u011b mo\u017en\u00e9 zahajovat nov\u00fd civiln\u00ed proces ve st\u00e1tu Wisconsin. Proces byl ji\u017e veden zhruba 20 let p\u0159ed t\u00edm a byl uzav\u0159en. Dosp\u011bli k z\u00e1v\u011bru, \u017ee nen\u00ed z\u0159ejm\u011b mo\u017en\u00e9 zah\u00e1jit ani nov\u00fd kanonick\u00fd proces v diec\u00e9zi, ale \u017ee je nutn\u00e9 zak\u00e1zat kn\u011bzi ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 p\u016fsoben\u00ed, zv\u00e1\u017eit trestn\u00ed sankce, \u017e\u00e1dat vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed l\u00edtosti nad t\u011bmi \u010diny, co\u017e bylo v situaci, kdy doty\u010dn\u00fd kn\u011bz byl prakticky izolov\u00e1n a velmi nemocn\u00fd, \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed velmi vhodn\u00e9.<\/p>\n O tom LN ml\u010d\u00ed, proto\u017ee se jim to nehod\u00ed. Brzy po t\u00e9to porad\u011b, dne 19. srpna d\u00e1v\u00e1 arcibiskup Weakland kardin\u00e1lu Bertonemu, se kter\u00fdm v\u011bc \u0159e\u0161il, zpr\u00e1vu o opat\u0159en\u00edch, kter\u00e1 ve v\u011bci ud\u011blal. Dva dny po t\u00e9, dne 21. srpna kn\u011bz Murphy, kter\u00fd byl v t\u00e9 dob\u011b u\u017e ve \u0161patn\u00e9m zdravotn\u00edm stavu, um\u00edr\u00e1 p\u0159irozenou smrt\u00ed. Arcibiskup Bertone byl o v\u011bci ihned zpraven. Odpov\u011bd\u011bl 28. z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed, \u017ee tuto skute\u010dnost bere na v\u011bdom\u00ed a \u017ee obvin\u011bn\u00ed z poru\u0161en\u00ed sv\u00e1tosti je ve skute\u010dnosti uzav\u0159eno …<\/p>\n M\u016f\u017eeme o\u010dek\u00e1vat, \u017ee LN vylo\u017e\u00ed svou le\u017e, kdy a jak \u201epape\u017e zatajil zneu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed 200 d\u011bt\u00ed\u201c? Doporu\u010duji srovnat tyto uveden\u00e9 skute\u010dnosti s v\u00fdmysly uveden\u00e9ho \u010dl\u00e1nku LN a posoudit, nakolik je titulek \u010dl\u00e1nku \u00fa\u010delov\u00fd, zav\u00e1d\u011bj\u00edc\u00ed a veden\u00fd nep\u0159\u00e1telstv\u00edm v\u016f\u010di c\u00edrkvi. Ano, pravda dost\u00e1v\u00e1 \u201ena frak\u201c! Mo\u017en\u00e1 i v ostatn\u00edch oblastech, o kter\u00fdch LN p\u00ed\u0161\u00ed!<\/p>\n Kardin\u00e1l Miloslav Vlk<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\u00e9dia se sna\u017e\u00ed obvinit Benedikta XVI., \u017ee byl informov\u00e1n o p\u0159\u00edpadech zneu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed d\u011bt\u00ed kn\u011b\u017e\u00edmi a \u017ee nic neud\u011blal. \u010casto argumentuj\u00ed nepravdiv\u00fdmi nebo p\u0159ekroucen\u00fdmi argumenty. Ani v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b onoho kn\u011bze v mnichovsk\u00e9 diec\u00e9zi, kde byl Ratzinger arcibiskupem, to ov\u0161em nevy\u0161lo… A … \u010c\u00edtaj \u010falej…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-co-sa-stalo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.uspenie.sk\/web\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.uspenie.sk\/web\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.uspenie.sk\/web\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.uspenie.sk\/web\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.uspenie.sk\/web\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=50"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.uspenie.sk\/web\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.uspenie.sk\/web\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=50"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.uspenie.sk\/web\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=50"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.uspenie.sk\/web\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=50"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}